HowManyFPS Desktop App v1.25.3Track Bottlenecks and Boost Your FPSOpen HowManyFPS.com on your PC to benchmark

CPU Comparison: FPS, Specs & Value

Core i3-10105F vs Core Ultra 9 285

The Core i3-10105F is quite a bit slower than the Core Ultra 9 285 on average across 100+ games. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.

bar_chartBenchmarks groupCommunity calculateFPS Calculator compressBottleneck Calculator

CPU

$101.60View CPUAll CPUs

Up to 497% cheaper – $101.60 vs $579
Up to 219% better value for money

CPU

Out of StockView CPUAll CPUs

Up to 87% faster on average across 100+ games
Is 3 years and 10 months newer
Up to 497% more expensive – $579 vs $101.60

FPS Comparison Across Popular Games

Predicted average FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, based on real game benchmarks.

Resolution

Quality

Paired GPU

View Compare All GPUs

Select GPU

Grand Theft Auto V2013

Core i3-10105F

206FPS

Core Ultra 9 285

225FPS

League of Legends2009

227FPS

423FPS

547FPS

756FPS

Escape From Tarkov2017

Core i3-10105F

222FPS

Core Ultra 9 285

266FPS

Valorant2020

Core i3-10105F

600FPS

Core Ultra 9 285

804FPS

Minecraft2011

Core i3-10105F

628FPS

Core Ultra 9 285

842FPS

Dota 22013

Core i3-10105F

194FPS

Core Ultra 9 285

310FPS

Call of Duty: Warzone 2.02020

Core i3-10105F

233FPS

Core Ultra 9 285

252FPS

Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Side-by-side specs, synthetic benchmarks, and key hardware differences.

Scorehelp

Core i3-10105F

30%

Core Ultra 9 285

71%

Core Ultra 9 285 ranks 41 points higher.

Coreshelp

Core i3-10105F

Core Ultra 9 285

Core Ultra 9 285 has 20 more cores.

Threadshelp

Core i3-10105F

Core Ultra 9 285

Core Ultra 9 285 has 16 more threads.

L3 Cachehelp

Core i3-10105F

6 MB

Core Ultra 9 285

36 MB

Core Ultra 9 285 has 30 MB more L3 cache.

Base Frequencyhelp

Core i3-10105F

3.7 GHz

Core Ultra 9 285

2.5 GHz

Core i3-10105F has a 48% higher base clock.

Turbo Frequencyhelp

Core i3-10105F

4.4 GHz

Core Ultra 9 285

5.6 GHz

Core Ultra 9 285 boosts 27% higher.

TDPhelp

Core i3-10105F

65W

Core Ultra 9 285

65W

Pricehelp

Core i3-10105F

$101.60

Core Ultra 9 285

Core i3-10105FCore Ultra 9 285

LGA1200

Sockethelp

LGA1851

Comet Lake-R

Codenamehelp

Arrow Lake-S

Desktop

Segmenthelp

Desktop

No Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPUhelp

Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU

2666 MHz (DDR4)

RAMhelp

6400 MHz (DDR5)

Not Overclockable

Overclock Supporthelp

Not Overclockable

Frequently Asked Questions

compare_arrowsWhich is better, Core i3-10105F or Core Ultra 9 285?expand_more

The Core Ultra 9 285. It's 128% faster than the Core i3-10105F on average across 100+ games, scoring 73/100 vs 32/100 in our gaming rating.

speedHow much faster is Core Ultra 9 285 than Core i3-10105F?expand_more

128% faster on average. The gap varies by game and resolution, check the per-game FPS comparison above.

aspect_ratioWhich is better for 1440p and 4K gaming, Core i3-10105F or Core Ultra 9 285?expand_more

The Core Ultra 9 285 is faster at both resolutions. Toggle the resolution selector above to see per-game FPS.

paidIs the Core Ultra 9 285 worth buying in 2026?expand_more

It scores 73/100 in our gaming rating, faster than most CPUs on the market. Good buy if the price is right.

differenceWhat is the difference between Core i3-10105F and Core Ultra 9 285?expand_more

Performance: Core i3-10105F scores 32/100, Core Ultra 9 285 scores 73/100. They also differ in core count, clock speeds, L3 cache, and power draw. Full breakdown in the specs section above.

compressWill the Core i3-10105F or Core Ultra 9 285 bottleneck my PC?expand_more

Depends on the rest of your build, especially your GPU. Swap the paired GPU in the FPS section above to see if it limits performance, or use our bottleneck calculator for a full analysis.

upgradeIs it worth upgrading to the Core i3-10105F or Core Ultra 9 285?expand_more

The Core Ultra 9 285 is the stronger pick at 73/100. Compare your current CPU against it to see the exact FPS gain across 100+ games.